I was going to say, the urban layout of Chicago means that tolling the highways directly would probably be easier to implement than full congestion pricing. The same goes for Boston - increasing and equalizing the tolls for bridges and arterials/highways would likely be sufficient.
However, I do think that for the less highway-centric downtowns of SF and DC, an NYC-style congestion relief zone makes more sense.
Do you have any insight into "Retail sales are up $900M " ? Is that similar in proportion to transit ridership or foot traffic ? Is this retail sales increase corroborated by increased sales tax receipts ?
I can’t wait to toll the Kennedy, Ike, and Dan Ryan in Chicago!
I was going to say, the urban layout of Chicago means that tolling the highways directly would probably be easier to implement than full congestion pricing. The same goes for Boston - increasing and equalizing the tolls for bridges and arterials/highways would likely be sufficient.
However, I do think that for the less highway-centric downtowns of SF and DC, an NYC-style congestion relief zone makes more sense.
incredible post, thank you!
Does increased MTA ridership result in the positive externality of greater farebox recovery?
How much do we save from faster busses?
Do you have any insight into "Retail sales are up $900M " ? Is that similar in proportion to transit ridership or foot traffic ? Is this retail sales increase corroborated by increased sales tax receipts ?
The data is from Affinity, a credit card sales data aggregator. However, I have not seen data on a pre-congestion pricing baseline that would be used to capture the % impact. https://nyc.streetsblog.org/2025/02/27/memo-to-the-president-manhattan-economy-improving-thanks-to-congestion-pricing
What about pedestrian safety? Are cars driving faster now that there's less congestion?
I know it sounds funny, but I sometimes felt safer biking in NYC when the cars were in a gridlock rather than speeding past.